- by Rahul Chadha, December 22, 2011
- Leave a comment
This post was written by STF blogger Jeff Halpin.
When Daniel McGowan was arrested by federal agents in 2005 as part of the largest domestic terrorism case in the history of the United States, the Environmental Liberation Front was deemed America’s “number one domestic terrorism threat.” The audience meets former ELF member McGowan during his house arrest, when he is facing life in prison plus 335 years for his crimes committed under new terrorism enhancements implemented after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Using rare archival footage, directors Marshall Curry and Sam Cullman in their film If A Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front capture the frenzy of youthful protesters striking out against any and all corporate offenders on the streets and in the national parks of Washington, Oregon and California, following the emergence of the radical black bloc during the 1999 WTO protests in Seattle. To continue reading, click “Read more” below.
[Photo: from left, directors Marshall Curry and Sam Cullman, courtesy of Simon Luethi]
Directors Curry and Cullman were on hand to join Stranger Than Fiction Artistic Director Thom Powers for the post-screening question and answer session about a documentary that raises so many questions terrorism, environmentalism, modern dissent and protest.
Suffused with mainstream media accounts of the group’s actions and extensive interviews with both federal prosecutors and ELF members, the film’s structure makes for a balanced and compelling story that successfully achieved Curry’s goal to probe deeper into the case. “The interesting thing was not that he did it, but why he did it,” said Curry.
When asked about his thoughts on the finished film, Curry was insightful. “I feel this film has a strong point of view, but it’s a complex point of view and it reflects the actual complexity of the situation,” he said. In response to an audience question on the genesis of the project, Curry replied that “the idea for the film dropped in our lap.” He added, “My wife was running a domestic violence organization in Brooklyn and came home from work one day and said, ‘You’ll never guess what happened at work today, four federal agents came in and arrested Daniel McGowan.’ I had met him before and looking at his face he does not look like someone that could be facing life in prison for domestic terrorism.”
With more interviews came more questions on the nature of the crimes committed and the rationale for causing the millions in damage by the ELF. “When we sat down in the edit room we realized our point of view had been stretched by the people we had interviewed and we tried to portray this in the film,” Curry said.
Referencing the scenes of police rubbing pepper spray into the eyes of non-violent protestors chained to old-growth trees in the film, Curry noted that it is a cautionary tale for both sides. “For demonstrators, what are the legal ramifications of your tactics? What are the ethical ramifications of your tactics? It is also a cautionary tale for law enforcement and the rest of society to think about what kind of reactions you get when you use violence against non-violent protesters.”
Both the federal agents involved the case and the former spokesman for the ELF have said that it is an important film, with federal agents going so far as to do publicity for the film’s premiere. “I hope the film gives people an opportunity to step away from the ideology and out of their comfort zone and think things through,” Curry said.
Related Film/Screening:
IF A TREE FALLS: A STORY OF THE EARTH LIBERATION FRONT by Marshall Curry and Sam Cullman
- by Rahul Chadha, December 21, 2011
- Leave a comment (1 so far)
On paper, a rundown of the masterful film Undefeated reads like a reboot of the 1986 Goldie Hawn vehicle Wildcats—a white coach takes on an underfunded, predominantly black high school football team in the inner city, and manages to show them how to succeed in life both on and off the field. But Hollywood retreats to the sports film genre only to trot out hackneyed plot points and mawkish scenes that leave viewers gagging. In making Undefeated, filmmakers T.J. Martin and Dan Lindsay instead relied on an immersive approach to documentary that recalls the sort of work practiced by the writers of the New Journalism movement of the 1960s and 70s (the George Plimpton book Paper Lion sprang immediately to mind). Martin and Lindsay relocated to Memphis, Tennessee, for nine months to produce the film, accruing some 500 hours of footage over that period, in true verite style. In volunteer coach Bill Courtney, the filmmakers also found a character whose charisma makes it difficult to turn one’s head from the screen. Too often our understanding of sports is filtered through the actions of overpaid athletes and coaches, as well as a massive marketing machine intent on selling us jerseys, beer and exorbitantly priced tickets. Undefeated is a window into the powerful transformative effect that something as simple as a game can have on people and communities who otherwise might not have anything else. Following the screening, Stranger Than Fiction Artistic Director Thom Powers spoke with Martin and Lindsay. Click “Read more” below for the Q&A, which contains plot spoilers.
Stranger Than Fiction: Can you tell us how you got into this film, and what you thought the film was going to be at the beginning?
Dan Lindsay: Originally, the way we found the story was the article in the film about O.C. living with one of his coaches. One of our producers, Rich Middlemas, went to the University of Tennessee and is a massive football fan, to the point where he obsesses over Tennessee’s recruiting, to the point where he looks at who the best players coming out of high school are. And this name, O.C. Brown started coming up, and he said, I don’t know who that is. So he googled the name, and the article came up. Rich had always worked in the studio world, and being our friend he sent it to us and said, I think this could be an interesting documentary. We actually weren’t as taken by it as Rich was, but there was something in the article that was at least interesting enough that we would contact O.C. In doing that, we heard about Bill, who we met via conference call, and even on that conference call we were like, this guy is incredible. So we went to Memphis to look at doing a film about O.C. and his senior year. While we were there Bill started telling us stories about years previous and the history of the team, and we just kind of decided to change focus. We didn’t know what would happen, but the stakes seemed high enough that if we showed up and were there for everything, we could potentially have something interesting. I don’t think we imagined that things would work out the way they did, and that the narratives would reveal themselves in that way.
T.J. Martin: With that said, not knowing what we would capture in our time there, we went into it with an approach in mind. Even if it was going to be O.C.’s story, we did want to take a verite approach. We wanted to capture a moment in time, a coming of age story. By the time we met Bill and he told us the history of the school and we met some of the other students, we kept that intimate approach, it just happened to get bigger and bigger the longer we stayed. And emotionally it got bigger and bigger. I don’t think we expected to have an amazing shot of Bill and O.C. hugging and crying at the end of the game, which they lost by one point! That’s like a Disney movie, how does that happen? But it did, and we were there.
Audience: How did the players feel after they had seen the film, and seen themselves portrayed in so many intimate, potentially embarrassing situations?
Lindsay: We premiered the film at South by Southwest, but we finished it about two days before we left. We couldnt’ show anybody the film beforehand, so we got them into Austin early enough where we could show them the film. But just in case, we talked them through every beat of the film. I think we actually set them up for the worst. Only Money and Chavis could come to the premiere, O.C. wasn’t allowed to come because he would be “endorsing” the film, according to NCAA regulations, which is ridiculous. He’s endorsing his own life. But Chavis ended up missing his flight and shows up like an hour before the screening. Money shows up and watches it in the hotel room. The only thing he was upset about was, in the doctor’s office, when he asks, is that my brain? He said, people are going to think I’m stupid. I was like, no it’s an endearing moment, trust me. Chavis shows up and he’s in the hotel room trying to change for the big premiere and he’s all flustered. So I’m holding my computer and trying to show him all the scenes he’s in, and I think we got through about two scenes and he goes, ah fuck it, I said it, it’s cool. So we went to the premiere and he watched it for the first time with everyone. In the Q&A Money was the one who said, that was really emotional, I didn’t even know you guys were even filming half of that stuff. We were able to go to Memphis and get O.C. to watch it. He said afterwards, you guys got it right.
Martin: I think that’s unanimously been the response. Everybody who was profiled in the film has said you captured the experience accurately. That was an accurate portrayal of our lives, in that moment, specifically. We had a screening in Memphis recently, and that was really nerve-wracking. I didn’t know what to say, I was so nervous. Everyone who opened up their homes for us was there. After the screening it was completely silent and we thought they didn’t like the film, and everyone shuttled out to the mezzanine. There were no questions. And then people didn’t leave, there were like 200 people that didn’t leave for two to three hours because they were so enthralled by watching the film. One of the best compliments we got was from one of the kids on the team who said, I actually thought we were gonna win the game, but I was there! I was like, wow, you just made my day.
Audience: I was wondering if any of the students became interested in the process of documentary filmmaking?
Lindsay: When we went there and met the principal for the first time we said, we’re moving here. We thought we’d have all of this free time and we offered to teach a class in video production. We talked about it, and then nothing happened. And then in November, maybe, a teacher we had never talked to came up and said he heard about our offer to make a movie with some of the students. He taught a history class, so for their senior project we ended up going to their class every Tuesday and Thursday, and we started Documentary 101. They made a five or seven minute video about the new curriculum that was being implemented in the school that we showed to all the teachers.
Martin: There was one student on the team who we keep in touch with to this day. He was really interested in filmmaking and photography, and we’ve always extended the invitation for him to come and visit us in L.A.
Audience: I’m curious about when you decided to follow which characters, and how the other students reacted to not being focused on in the film. Or was that clear to them as the season was going on?
Lindsay: We met Money on the first trip we took to Memphis in the spring. For us it was about finding the characters that had the potential for a dramatic arc, that had a goal in mind. And it was either going to be realized or not at the end of the school year. So for O.C., he was either going to qualify or he wasn’t. The first time we met Money he was waiting for Bill at the weight room. Here’s this kid, and everyone else is late, and he’s just sitting there. As Bill was walking in he was saying some kid had gotten suspended, and Money overhears it and says, you’ll never catch me suspended coach. I was like, who is that kid? We went over to his house and the first thing we ever shot with him were his turtles. Chavis showed up to the team, and he was obviously so dynamic, and his actions were affecting the team, so we knew he had to be a character. Then there was one or two other players that we kind of started following, but we kind of knew who the characters would be. We got lucky that Chavis and Money’s storylines crossed.
Martin: We didn’t know what would happen, but we knew our approach going in. We wanted to craft a more narrative structural film to the point where people forgot they were watching a documentary. Part of that is to find who could have the most dramatic arc in a short period of time, and that’s when these characters started revealing themselves. The truth of the matter is that every kid had a very compelling story, but we wanted to make sure the storylines affected each other, and intersected each other. And that it wasn’t like a series of vignettes in different worlds, that it was a cohesive narrative at the end of the day.
Lindsay: O.C. and Money were friends, and O.C. is getting all of the support and Money has no support, but they’re still trying to achieve the same things. Chavis was important because of what he did to the team. I think we were halfway through production and we were like, we should probably start focusing on the people who score the touchdowns, because they’re exciting on the field. We were just interested in characters.
Martin: We fought ourselves in not wanting to make a “football movie,” but they were having a pretty amazing season, and then we were like, maybe we should follow the quarterback. We did follow two or three other characters. For example a defensive end, when we met him, he had just turned 18 and been kicked out of the foster system. He was really fortunate to be taken in by one of his coaches, and that was his 19th foster home in four years. So we followed that storyline from day one, but it did not fit in.
Lindsay: He didn’t have an effect on the team, he was very separate from the team.
Martin: But there were a lot of stories like that.
Lindsay: We may have known that the rest of the characters weren’t going to be as prominent, but we still spent a ton of time with them. It was important to us, we got very attached to all of these guys. We would interview them even knowing it wasn’t going to be in the film, it was important for them to at least have the opportunity to tell us their story.
Martin: That’s part of the reason we shot 500 hours of footage. Part of that is that we show up from L.A. and we say we want to commit to telling their story. And part of that is showing up every day, and showing up to talent shows that we knew weren’t going to be in the film. But we wanted to commit to the team and to the community at large and be present.
STF: Talk to us about two scenes that are so emotional: when the coach is on the phone telling Money that he’s going to get this scholarship, and then the scene at the end with the coach and O.C. They’re so emotional to watch as a viewer, I want to know what it was like to be shooting and holding up your professional duties to film them.
Lindsay: I don’t think we did. I was crying, and you can see the camera is out of focus. When Money found out about his scholarship, if you watch the film it goes out of focus because he starts walking away and I couldn’t get my hand up to focus because I was crying. Finally, I had to put the camera down and collect myself, because we were so connected to these guys. I knew what that meant to him.
Martin: After a while practice got redundant, so we would swap out. I was actually at our apartment editing dailies and I got flood of texts—where are you? Get to the practice field! I was like, what is going on?
Lindsay: That was amazing because that’s near the end. I was filming something else, and we would always mike up Bill because everything seemed to flow through him. We didn’t have a sound guy, we had to be strategic about what we did. I heard Bill in my headphones say, that’s amazing. And I thought, what’s amazing? And turned my camera over to him, and all of that unfolded. The moment with O.C. and Bill—at games T.J. would film and roam around and I would always follow Bill. The end of the game comes and he hugs Money and starts walking over to O.C. and hugs him. And I don’t hear anything, and I was like, his mike just went out at the climax of his movie. And I thought, I have a mike on my camera, I’ll circle around and get what he’s saying. As I’m circling around, I hear, hold on, I’m trying to tell you something. And I just kept circling around. In my head I was thinking, that was probably pretty cool, but it wasn’t until the next day that I thought about it again. We were pretty depressed that night, we went out on a bit of a bender, and we woke up the next day and loaded the footage into the computer. At the end of the game I was going back with the players and Bill and I put the camera down and I looked at Bill and we just hugged each other. I don’t think we were thinking about the film at that point, we were just so disappointed for these guys. They had worked so hard to make this happen, and we felt a part of that. It was a very emotional moment for us.
[Q&A has been edited for length and clarity]
Related Film/Screening:
UNDEFEATED by Dan Lindsay and T.J. Martin
- by Rahul Chadha, December 21, 2011
- Leave a comment (1 so far)
This post was written by STF blogger Jeff Halpin.
When United States Marine Corps Master Sgt. Jerry Ensminger’s daughter Janey fell ill and died of leukemia at the age of nine, he was devastated. For years after, he found himself seeking answers to how such a sudden illness could occur in a healthy child. After watching a local news broadcast detailing possible water contamination during his family’s time at Camp Lejune, the largest military installation on the east coast and home base of the U.S. Marine Corps, he began to dig for answers and uncovered one of the largest water contamination incidents in U.S. history.
After years of painstaking research, and relying on only a second-hand computer and a dial-up modem, Ensminger built his case and eventually brought it to Washington. Venturing from his single-wide trailer to Capitol Hill for the first time, he recalled that he “felt like a vacuum cleaner salesman.” His initial efforts led to a full-page article in the Washington Post, and a slot testifying before Congress in 2004. The film, Semper Fi, which follows his journey, is a intensely crafted narrative that captures the raw emotion of the loss of loved ones to a completely preventable tragedy, the fight against government bureaucracy and one father’s search for truth. To continue reading, click “Read more” below.
[Photo: from left, director Rachel Libert and Jerry Ensminger, courtesy of Simon Luethi]
Raphaela Niehausen, executive director of Stranger Than Fiction, welcomed Sgt. Ensminger and film directors Rachel Libert and Tony Hardmon to the IFC Center stage for the audience question and answer session following the screening to explain how they came to collaborate on this powerful documentary. Libert and Hardmon were researching a different film about a public health organization, and were about to exit the project when then press secretary for the group told them about her brother who had “uncovered a case of water contamination at a Marine Corps base.” Skeptical, they agreed to shoot the hearing. After meeting Ensminger and viewing his volumes of evidence, they were intrigued “the notion of a soldier becoming activist.” Libert also explained that Ensminger personally does not like the title of “activist.”
Despite his frustration and anger with the conduct senior officials in the Marine Corps, Ensminger took pains to make it clear he still firmly believes in the fundamental character of the Marines. “I’m always very careful to tell every audience that I speak to, that while I am absolutely appalled at the conduct and the demonstration of deceitfulness by the very highest levels of leadership in the United States Marine Corps, I will assure you of this one thing: our motto ‘Semper Fidelis,’ and our slogan, ‘We take care of our own,’ are still very much alive and well down at the unit and operation levels.”
Ensminger added, “When any institution and the people that are in charge of that institution, out of some sort of weird justification, try to protect that institution over the protection of people, they are wrong. No matter how they try and justify their misguided intentions, they are wrong. People come first. For god’s sake, without people, there would be no institutions.” When asked how he found the strength to take on such a daunting adversary, he replied, “If you know you’re right why would you ever quit?”
You can download Sgt. Ensminger’s Camp Lejune chronology of significant environmental events here. And for more information on his case you can visit www.semperfialwaysfaithful.com.
Related Film/Screening:
SEMPER FI: ALWAYS FAITHFUL by Tony Hardmon and Rachel Libert
- by Rahul Chadha, December 20, 2011
- Leave a comment (1 so far)
This post was written by STF blogger Jeff Halpin.
Initially uninterested in attending what he surmised would be a boring dance recital, a 1985 performance of Pina Bausch’s “Cafe Mueller” changed filmmaker Wim Wenders’ preconceptions about dance. Wenders was soon proposing a film collaboration with her company, but felt he lacked the technical skill to capture the movements on-screen. Twenty years later, in 2007, he finally discovered the technology that would allow him to capture the enchanting and engrossing performances he had seen decades earlier on film.
Intercutting archival footage of Bausch in performance and in her studio with solo and group performances, Wenders’ film Pina allows the length and intensity of the pieces to follow the tone that each of his interviews takes with members of Bausch’s dance troupe. We watch as they reminisce, celebrate and exalt the woman who had drawn so much from them, and given so much back to them as performers and as people.
The dancers are shot in locales as varied as the precipice of a massive canyon in Germany’s Bergisches Land region, to the Wuppertal suspension railway for the solos in “Kontakthof.” All the while, Alain Derobe’s 3-D sterographic cameras move effortlessly from the interior stages at the Wuppertal Opera House to the exterior expositions with an eye to movement, sound and pacing that only Wenders could produce.
Renowned dance critic Deborah Jowitt joined Stranger Than Fiction Artistic Director Thom Powers for the post-screening audience question and answer, and said that what was most unique about Bausch was that “she was created worlds on stage.” Bauch’s introduction to U.S. audiences occurred during a period in which modern dance had moved away from narrative, but the worlds that she created were different than any Jowitt had previously seen.
When asked what her reaction to Bausch’s initial New York appearances was, Jowitt explained, “I thought it was alarming, I thought it was playful, I didn’t really know what I thought about it at first. I was apprehensive, but there was so much strangeness and humor in it, right away you could see that she had certain structural ideas that you can see in how Wenders uses it in the film.”
Jowitt gave details on how exactly Pina was able to master “the idea of bringing stories out of her dancers,” by drawing on the experiences of each individual performer. “She would say, ‘Tell me the worst birthday you ever had,’ and she would then weave that into something, with talking, singing or gesturing.”
With regard to the challenge of capturing dance on film, Jowitt remarked that the success and strength of Wenders’ work lies in the fact that “he wanted to bring the audience into it, he wanted you to feel that you were in it. I think that is particularly suitable to Pina, because she does create these specific environments on stage.”
IFC opens “PINA” in limited release December 23.
You can read Deborah Jowitt’s article on Pina here.
- by Rahul Chadha, December 18, 2011
- Leave a comment (1 so far)
This post was written by STF blogger Aaron Cael.
What happens when Frank Gehry wants to, as he says, “build a community from scratch,” on top of your existing community? Battle for Brooklyn chronicles that struggle as Prospect Heights residents wake up to find themselves living in the footprint of the planned Atlantic Yards development, a subsidy-soaked high profile construction project backed by a veritable whos-who of New York heavy hitters: Mayor Bloomberg, Chuck Schumer, Marty Markowitz, Jay-Z and the megaproject firm Forest City Ratner. The film serves as an important study of just how the lumbering juggernaut of crony capitalism moves through economic, social and political realms, flattening all opposition.
What drives the film are the machinations of these soundbite-dropping familiar faces, and the strong characters on both sides who lay out the facts as they see them. On the side of the long-time neighborhood residents, the cameras track Daniel Goldstein as he fights the strange battle that comes when powerful people want to take your home and build a stadium on top of it with your tax dollars. Bruce Bender, Executive VP at Forest Ratner, ostensibly makes the other side’s case, but somehow ends up making a pretty good argument that the dealings with those being driven from their homes are far from ethical. Bender looks close to winking when he’s singing the praises of the jobs to be created in telemarketing, VIP services and concessions by relieving small business owners in the project’s path of their property and livelihood. There’s also a meta-character hovering around in the background—Eminent Domain—that is both seen and unseen, a figure with nearly limitless potential to destroy that only shows up in the text of court rulings and the cute jokes that elected officials make about stealing property.
There’s an implicit honesty to the film’s lack of slickness. The camera shakes, the audio drops out at times or gets drowned by the truck horns and demolition crews. These flaws mark it as a document made by a situation, a response to a crisis, and not a detached eye hovering above the little people. Flawed in no way means inept: I challenge any other filmmaker to eke as much tension out of a shot of a man sitting at his computer, hitting ‘refresh’ on a web browser over and over. It all adds up to a careful, patient refutation of the claim made by Bloomberg at the film’s midpoint, “You have Bruce Ratner’s word; that should be good enough.”
After the film, primary subject Daniel Goldstein described the film as being essentially about the government and developers “working together to deny people their rights…. an issue that cuts across the political spectrum.” Director Michael Galinsky concurred, citing the strange allies the struggle brought together. (Both conservative columnist George Will and civil liberties attorney Norman Siegel appear in the film.) “It’s not left, it’s not right. It’s just wrong.”
[Photo: from left, director Michael Galinsky and producer David Beilinson, courtesy of Simon Luethi]